The Truth Seekers cover art

The Truth Seekers

The Truth Seekers

By: Worleybird Innovation Works
Listen for free

About this listen

Truth Seekers: Where Data Meets Reality Tired of sensational headlines and conflicting health advice? Join Alex Barrett and Bill Morrison as they cut through the noise to uncover what scientific research actually says about the claims flooding your social media feed. Each week, Alex and Bill tackle a different health, nutrition, or wellness claim that everyone's talking about. From "blue light ruins your sleep" to "seed oils are toxic," they dig into the actual studies, examine the methodologies, and translate the data into plain English. No agenda. No sponsors to please. No credentials to fake. Just two people committed to finding out what's really true by going straight to the source—the research itself. Perfect for anyone who's skeptical of influencer health advice but doesn't have time to read every scientific study themselves. New episodes drop regularly, delivering clarity in a world full of clickbait. Question everything. Verify with data. Find the truth. Disclaimer: Truth Seekers provides educational content based on published research. Nothing in this podcast should be considered medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health and wellbeing.© Worleybird Innovation Works Hygiene & Healthy Living Science
Episodes
  • Half-Truths: The Shingles Vaccine's Surprising Heart Claim
    Apr 30 2026
    Headlines claim the shingles shot cuts heart disease risk 'nearly in half' — a claim that sounds revolutionary. But the actual research tells a different story, and media outlets have conflated two completely separate studies with wildly different findings. In this episode, we unpack how 18% relative risk became 'nearly half,' why absolute risk numbers matter far more than the percentages in headlines, and what healthy user bias reveals about why vaccinated people seem healthier overall. You'll discover the real cardiovascular benefit (far more modest than reported), why the researchers themselves warn against causal claims, and the single question that will change how you read every health headline forever. The takeaway: the shingles vaccine is genuinely worth getting — just not for the reasons the news told you. A quick note—the opinions and analysis shared on Truth Seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or wellbeing.
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
  • The 45% That Isn't: What the Ultra-Processed Food Headlines Got Wrong
    Apr 27 2026
    "Ultra-processed foods linked to 45 percent higher cancer risk." It's everywhere—and it's terrifying people. But here's what the headlines missed: the study didn't measure cancer at all, it measured benign polyps. And that 45 percent number? It's a relative risk increase applied to a 4 percent baseline, which means the actual difference is 1.8 percentage points. We break down how one real study in a narrow population of health-conscious nurses got transformed into a universal health scare through relative risk manipulation, self-reported dietary data, and selective reporting that ignored a much larger study finding no effect. Learn the three questions that cut through health headline noise: is it relative or absolute risk? What's the actual baseline? And who was in the study? A quick note—the opinions and analysis shared on Truth Seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or wellbeing.
    Show More Show Less
    17 mins
  • The Orthosomnia Trap: How Your Sleep Tracker Might Be Giving You Insomnia
    Apr 23 2026
    Your Fitbit claims you barely slept—but the sleep lab says you're fine. So why do you feel exhausted? Meet orthosomnia, a real clinical condition where sleep trackers trigger the very anxiety that destroys sleep. While wearables flood millions of users with daily "deep sleep" scores, Harvard researchers discovered they're wildly inaccurate at measuring sleep stages—the Apple Watch misses deep sleep by an average of 43 minutes. Yet these devices use only heart rate and movement data, not brain waves, to make those claims. We investigate why trackers excel at detecting whether you're awake or asleep but fail spectacularly at the metrics people obsess over, how the marketing disconnect between "clinical-grade precision" and actual device capability creates psychological harm, and what the research really shows about sleep tracking's actual usefulness versus its very real costs. A quick note—the opinions and analysis shared on Truth Seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or wellbeing.
    Show More Show Less
    16 mins
No reviews yet