Send us Fan Mail

In this episode of Leadership Multiverse, Andrew and Ellen take on Steve Rogers, better known as Captain America, and ask whether he really deserves his reputation as one of popular culture’s clearest examples of values-based leadership under pressure.

The discussion explores his moral clarity, courage, calm crisis leadership and ability to build followership in moments of danger. It also asks harder questions about his rigidity, his difficulty with compromise, his loyalty to Bucky, the breakdown of the Avengers, and whether principled leadership can become destabilising when it leaves too little room for accountability, ambiguity and other people’s perspectives.

Along the way, Andrew and Ellen consider the Sokovia Accords, Civil War, sacrifice, emotional intelligence, operational command, and whether Steve Rogers would survive in Starfleet, Star Wars, The Boys, Game of Thrones or DC. Spoiler: Andrew remains deeply unconvinced.

A lively episode on moral leadership, wartime leadership, personal loyalty, and the difference between being worthy and being easy to work with.

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

This week, The Leadership Multiverse heads back to Starfleet to explore the leadership of Captain Christopher Pike.

We look at Pike as a servant leader: calm, values-led, emotionally intelligent and deeply trusted by his crew. We discuss how he creates psychological safety, invites challenge, humanises command and carries the burden of knowing his own tragic future.

We also ask where his strengths become risks. Does his empathy tip into paternalism? Does he carry too much alone? Can a leader who values consensus still move quickly when the moment demands command?

Expect comparisons with Kirk, Picard, Burnham, Sisko and Janeway, plus the usual attempt to place him somewhere improbable in the wider leadership multiverse.

Support the show

Send us Fan Mail

This week, we turn to Professor X: calm, principled and often held up as the model of thoughtful leadership.

We explore how his style shifts over time, from coach and mentor to something more controlling, and question whether his belief in coexistence strengthens or limits those around him. Along the way, we test his moral authority, his reliance on persuasion, and the fine line between protecting a team and holding it back.

By the end, this is a more complicated portrait of leadership than it first appears, and one that will change how you see him.

Support the show