The Shroud of Turin Debate: Fact, Fiction, or 14th Century Forgery?
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
The Shroud of Turin Debate: Fact, Fiction, or 14th Century Forgery?
-
Narrated by:
-
By:
Summary
Christopher Enoch reacts to the Piers Morgan debate on the Shroud of Turin. Is it the authentic burial cloth of Jesus Christ, or a 14th-century medieval forgery? We break down the historical absence of the Shroud, the anatomical impossibilities of the image, the carbon dating coincidence, and the fascinating iron gall ink theory.
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
5:30 Reaction to Piers Morgan Shroud Debate
10:19 The Absence of the Shroud in the Gospels
26:19 Burial Practices in the First Century
42:23 Why Did the Shroud Emerge in the 14th Century?
1:03:48 The Mandylion vs The Shroud
1:14:28 The Carbon Dating Coincidence
1:17:14 Anatomical Abnormalities of the Shroud
1:46:02 How Many People Were Crucified?
2:01:53 The Iron Gall Ink Theory
2:11:46 The Four Pillars of Authenticity
2:27:15 Final Thoughts