In this follow-up episode of Group Practice, host Neal Goldstein addresses listener feedback about non-competes in physician practices. He tackles three key questions: Are non-competes ever appropriate? What’s the point of enforcing them if they’re often struck down? And what alternatives exist?

Neal argues non-competes remain appropriate in several contexts: competing against hospital systems, PE-backed practice sales, groups with exclusive hospital contracts, and specialties with high capital costs. He emphasizes that despite headlines suggesting otherwise, non-competes are still being enforced and represent valuable contractual rights worth protecting.

For practices seeking alternatives, Neal offers practical strategies: conditioning tail coverage on non-competition, structuring severance with clawback provisions, strengthening non-solicitation clauses, and negotiating robust no-hire provisions in hospital contracts.

In this episode of Group Practice, host Neal Goldstein interviews Dr. Lowell Weil, Executive Chairman of Balance Health and formerly the CEO of Weil Foot & Ankle Institute a 53-physician podiatry group founded by his father Dr. Lowell Weil Sr. Dr. Weil discusses the five practice settings for podiatrists: solo/small practices, orthopedic groups, hospital systems, large independent groups, and platform-backed groups like Balance Health.

Dr. Weil highlights the mounting challenges facing small practices – stagnant Medicare reimbursement, rising costs, and physician burnout – and explains how Balance Health addresses these issues by providing operational support, compliance infrastructure, and professional camaraderie while preserving clinical autonomy.

What sets Balance Health apart is its physician-majority ownership structure, with over 150 podiatrist-owners, physician leadership at all levels, and a commitment to hiring and developing young doctors. Dr. Weil emphasizes that patient care, not profit, drives the organization’s mission.

In this episode of Group Practice, host Neal Goldstein welcomes his partner, and leader of PFS’s labor and employment practice, Nora Walsh, for a deep dive into the evolving world of physician non-competes. They explore the common law foundations – reasonableness in time and geography, and protectable interests – and how Illinois’s landmark Fifield case added consideration requirements, later codified in the Freedom to Work Act. The conversation surveys the national landscape: outright bans in California, Minnesota, and others; Texas’s practical buyout approach; Florida’s employer-friendly stance; and recent restrictions for healthcare workers in states like Colorado and Delaware. They also discuss the FTC’s abandoned federal ban and why the current administration may still target healthcare non-competes. Key takeaway: Non-competes have not gone away, but employers and physicians alike need to understand their state’s rules, and the risks of overreaching.