The Conflict over the Conflict cover art

The Conflict over the Conflict

The Israel/Palestine Campus Debate

Preview

Get 30 days of Standard free

£5.99/mo after trial. Cancel monthly.
Try for £0.00
More purchase options

The Conflict over the Conflict

By: Kenneth S. Stern
Narrated by: Kenneth S. Stern
Try for £0.00

£5.99 a month after 30 days. Cancel anytime.

Buy Now for £13.80

Buy Now for £13.80

Summary

The Conflict over the Conflict chronicles one of the most divisive and toxic issues on today’s college and university campuses: Israel/Palestine.

Some pro-Palestinian students call supporters of Israel's right to exist racist, and disrupt their events. Some pro-Israel students label pro-Palestinian students terrorists, and the Jews among them traitors. Lawsuits are filed. Legislation is proposed. Faculty members are blacklisted and receive death threats. Academic freedom is compromised and the entire academic enterprise is threatened. How did we get here and what can be done?

In this passionate book, Kenneth S. Stern examines attempts from each side to censor the other at a time when some say students, rather than being challenged to wrestle with difficult issues and ideas, are being quarantined from them. He uniquely frames the examination: our ability to think rationally is inhibited when our identity is fiercely connected to an issue of perceived social justice or injustice, and our proclivity to see in-groups and out-groups–us versus them–is obvious. According to Stern, the campus is the best place to mine this conflict and our intense views about it to help future generations do what they are supposed to do: think. The Conflict over the Conflict shows how this is possible.

©2020 University of Toronto Press (P)2024 University of Toronto Press
Education Higher & Continuing Education Judaism Politics & Government Middle East Social justice Student
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_c
All stars
Most relevant
Some interesting points, and you can definitely get something out of it if you’re interested in the toxicity of the debate around Israel-Palestine. But not overly engaging and a bit light. Certainly made a desperate attempt to be as non-biased as possible, but sometimes it felt like it (surprisingly) refused to engage with certain complexities around antisemitism in particular.

Interesting enough

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.